Lesson Plan for "A Small, Good Thing"

Developing Characterization in Raymond Carver’s “A Small, Good Thing”



Overview
Students read Raymond Carver’s short story “A Small, Good Thing,” focusing on characterization in order to develop one of the static characters—the hit-and-run driver who causes Scotty’s death—more fully. Students use a literary graphic organizer to analyze the three major characters then create an original anecdote involving the driver, share their stories, and respond to each other’s writing.

This lesson plan was developed as part of a collaborative professional writing initiative sponsored by the Kennesaw Mountain Writing Project (KMWP) at Kennesaw State University.


From Theory to Practice
This lesson focuses on transforming text, a practice that is “powered by imagination” and that “reduces the distance between students and texts via processes of personal and active engagement,” according to Kathleen Andrasick (132).

Students “reduce the distance” between themselves and the text as they consider the writer’s characterization strategies. They then actively engage with the text as they add dimensions to one of Carver’s static characters, creating a scenario which demonstrates the dynamic traits of the character.

Further Reading
Andrasick, Kathleen Dudden. Opening Texts: Using Writing to Teach Literature. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1990.


Student Objectives
Students will
analyze static and dynamic characters in “A Small, Good Thing.”
discuss character development in the short story.
compose a narrative of an incident involving one of the static characters.
share their work with classmates.
respond to a classmate’s writing.

Instructional Plan
Resources
TAG Writing Response
Dynamic vs. Static Characters
“A Small, Good Thing” Characterization Worksheet
“A Small, Good Thing” Rubric
Literary Elements Map
Preparation
Obtain enough copies of Raymond Carver’s short stories “A Small, Good Thing” and “The Bath” for each of your students.
Familiarize yourself with TAG response to writing by reviewing the TAG Writing Response handout.
Make copies or overhead transparencies of the TAG Writing Response, “A Small, Good Thing” Characterization Worksheet, and Dynamic vs. Static Characters Handouts.
Make copies of the “A Small, Good Thing” Rubric.
Test the Literary Elements Map on your computers to familiarize yourself with the tool and ensure that you have the Flash plug-in installed. You can download the plug-in from the Technical Support page.
Instruction and Activities

Session One
Distribute copies of Raymond Carver’s short story “A Small, Good Thing” to students. Have students take turns reading sections of the story in small groups of three or four students.
Discuss the definitions of dynamic characters and static characters with students. Share the Dynamic vs. Static Characters Handout or the pertinent section of the Outline on Literary Elements with students. After the discussion, students should understand that dynamic characters undergo basic changes during the course of a story.
Ask students to name the dynamic and static characters in “A Small, Good Thing,” and record their responses on the board. Students should note that in this story, the baker is a dynamic character who undergoes a change at the end of the story, after his confrontation with Ann and Howard Weiss.
To develop discussion, ask students questions such as the following:


Why is the baker a dynamic character?
How would you describe his character at the beginning of the story? In the middle?
How did he change after his meeting with Ann and Howard Weiss?
Why do you think he changed in this way?


Direct students to the Literary Elements Map, and have them use the Character Map Graphic Organizer option to map the three main characters: Ann Weiss, Howard Weiss, and the baker. Note that they will complete and print the organizer three different times.
Next, tell students that Carver’s first version of this story is titled “The Bath.” For homework, have students read “The Bath” and note how the original version differs from “A Small, Good Thing.”
Session Two
Ask students the following questions about “The Bath”:


How is the ending of “The Bath” different from that of “A Small, Good Thing”? (Students should note that the original story ends with the lines, “‘Have you forgotten about Scotty?’ the man said. Then he hung up.”)
What do we learn about the baker in “A Small, Good Thing” that is not revealed in “The Bath”?
How has changing the ending altered the baker from a static to a dynamic character?
Why might Carver have altered the resolution to this story?
Which ending do you prefer as a reader? Why?


Tell students they will now create an anecdote or incident involving the hit-and-run driver that will allow them to turn him into a dynamic character.
Have students read through the “A Small, Good Thing” Characterization Worksheet and write responses after each step.
After they have completed the worksheet, ask students to share their papers with partners.
Next, have students use the TAG Writing Response handout as a guide for peer conferences. Using the sheet, students prompt their partners to:


T—Tell how the hit-and-run driver has become more of a dynamic character. (Anticipated response: “He has changed from ____ to ____.”)
A—Ask the writer a question about something in the story that needs clarification.
G—Give advice about how the writer could improve this story for publication.


Ask students to use their TAG Writing Response sheets and completed “A Small, Good Thing” Characterization Worksheet handouts to write an anecdote or incident involving the hit-and-run driver for homework.
Session Three
Ask students (in small groups or as a whole class) to answer the following questions about their anecdotes:


How has the hit-and-run driver in your anecdote changed from a static to a dynamic character?
How might this characterization alter Carver’s story?
What role do you think static characters play in a story?


Call for several volunteers to read aloud their anecdotes to the class, or have students share them in small groups.
Collect the anecdotes and provide feedback.
Extensions
Adapt this activity for use with static characters in other short stories or novels.


Extend your study of Raymond Carver’s short stories with ReadWriteThink’s Outside In: Finding A Character’s Heart Through Art lesson.


Extend your students’ study of characterization with these ReadWriteThink lessons:


Analyzing Character Development in Three Short Stories About Women
Become a Character: Adjectives, Character Traits, and Perspective
Book Report Alternative: Characters for Hire! Studying Character in Drama
Word Maps: Developing Critical and Analytical Thinking About Literary Characters


Web Resources
A Small, Good Thing
http://wings.buffalo.edu/AandL/english/courses/eng201d/asmallgoodthing.html
SUNY, Buffalo provides this online copy of Carver’s short story “A Small, Good Thing.”


Outline on Literary Elements
http://www.orangeusd.k12.ca.us/yorba/literary_elements.htm
This resource, from the University of South Florida, provides detailed definitions of literary elements including character, plot, setting, theme, style, point of view, and tone.
Student Assessment/Reflections
Observe groups during reading and discussion. Are all students participating in reading activities? How well do students understand the differences between static and dynamic characters?


Check students’ Literary Elements Maps for completion and understanding of the characters in “A Small, Good Thing.”


Check the “A Small, Good Thing” Characterization Worksheet and TAG Writing Response sheet for completion and understanding of the process. Did students write interesting and complete responses on their “A Small, Good Thing” Characterization Worksheets? Did they create interesting, dynamic characters based on their responses? Did partners offer their peers helpful, relevant suggestions for their anecdotes?


Use the “A Small, Good Thing” Rubric to assess students’ group and written work.